![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGNKohnxN6Gt1jlxV-4lYN1YrzoInW8eE6AHCo60Ft8TyLo7MSUfLyzeFOd6-1ShZkia-n1NLABEQZGPWH38Gvw0yUYQ7cB4kO_Ts_lnlNr8oEaZx89GXRUBIVlQog5VeVEMmdtH49_1OM/s200/ketchup-on-hot-dog.jpg)
Kevin Pang, writer for the Chicago Tribune,
has a piece saying St.
Mike Royko was
WRONG regarding ketchup on a hot dog (though the point is that it's a
Chicago hot dog). Pang quotes Royko thusly: "No, I won't condemn anyone for putting ketchup on a hot dog. This is the land of the free. And if someone wants to put ketchup on a hot dog and actually eat the awful thing, that is their right."
That is a perfectly valid argument. But Pang grows a pair and declares that Mike Royko was wrong.
I am against ketchup on a hot dog. I am pro ketchup on fries. I don't hate ketchup. I do like to soup up my ketchup with hot sauce, mustard, tabasco, and black pepper. But it is still recognizable as ketchup. I eat it. On fries. And like it.
But my kids like ketchup on hot dogs. I told them that they had to quit eating hot dogs that way when they reached 12, but my daughter has not, and she's past that age. My friend, who runs a little hot dog stand that nobody's ever heard of, says that he has no problem if a customer requests ketchup on a hot dog.
Royko was right, however. It's not the way to do, but I would never make fun of someone for doing it. (OK, maybe not never, but rarely.)